Monday, October 12, 2026 · Free to read

Conspiracy Timelines

A public archive of dated, sourced, member-built timelines, and the places where they cross.

CT-000012 · Filed by @archivedesk · Oct 12, 2026

NSA bulk collection of Americans' phone records

The member’s thesis

For more than a decade the NSA secretly collected the calling records of millions of Americans, and the public learned of it only after a leaked court order was published in 2013. A federal oversight board and two federal appeals courts then found that Section 215 did not authorize the program, and in 2015 Congress passed the USA FREEDOM Act reforming the business-records authority it relied on.

Report

Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  1. DOCUMENTED Source: judiciary.senate.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    Presidential authorization starts NSA bulk metadata collection

    After the September 11 attacks, a classified presidential authorization directed the NSA to collect, among other things, telephone and Internet metadata in bulk, without court orders. This later became known as part of the President's Surveillance Program. The account comes from the 2014 report of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  2. DOCUMENTED Source: judiciary.senate.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    Secret FISA court order moves phone-records collection under Section 215

    A Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge signed an order (docket BR 06-05) approving the government's application to collect calling records in bulk under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. According to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, the order was not accompanied by an opinion explaining the decision to grant the application.

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  3. DOCUMENTED Source: judiciary.senate.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    Justice Department briefing confirms NSA searched the records contrary to court orders

    In January 2009, Justice Department representatives attended an NSA briefing. That briefing and later communication confirmed that an automated NSA 'alert list' system had been searching the Section 215 phone records in a manner contrary to the FISA court's orders. A FISA court judge ordered the government to file a written brief, and the government acknowledged that the NSA's descriptions of the alert list process to the court had been 'inaccurate.'

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  4. DOCUMENTED Source: govinfo.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    Director of National Intelligence says "No, sir" in Senate hearing

    In an open hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Ron Wyden asked whether the NSA collects any type of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions, of Americans. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper answered "No, sir," and then "Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently, perhaps, collect, but not wittingly."

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  5. DOCUMENTED Source: theguardian.com (opens the source in a new tab)

    The Guardian publishes the secret Verizon court order

    The Guardian, in a story by reporter Glenn Greenwald, reported on a top-secret FISA court order it had obtained. The order required Verizon, on an "ongoing, daily basis," to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries. The paper said the document showed for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens were being collected indiscriminately and in bulk.

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  6. DOCUMENTED Source: judiciary.senate.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    Federal privacy board finds the program has no adequate legal basis

    The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, an independent federal agency, concluded that Section 215 does not provide an adequate legal basis for the bulk telephone records program. It also found the program had shown only limited value and recommended that the government end it.

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  7. DOCUMENTED Source: govinfo.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    Second Circuit rules bulk collection was not authorized by Section 215

    In ACLU v. Clapper (No. 14-42), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the bulk telephone metadata program went beyond what Congress authorized in Section 215.

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  8. DOCUMENTED Source: govinfo.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    USA FREEDOM Act approved as Public Law 114-23

    Public Law 114-23, the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015, was approved on June 2, 2015. Its title describes it as an act 'to reform the authorities of the Federal Government to require the production of certain business records, conduct electronic surveillance, use pen registers and trap and trace devices, and use other forms of information gathering' for foreign intelligence and related purposes.

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

  9. DOCUMENTED Source: cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov (opens the source in a new tab)

    Ninth Circuit rules the program violated FISA and may have been unconstitutional

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard an appeal in a terrorism-financing prosecution (No. 13-50572). It held that the metadata collection went beyond what Congress authorized and therefore violated FISA, and that it may have violated the Fourth Amendment. The court also said public statements by government officials suggesting the program had been important to the case were inconsistent with the classified record.

    Report

    Reports from three different networks hide this at once until it is reviewed. For legal matters use the notice form.

End of the timeline. 9 events, as filed by @archivedesk.

Have a timeline of your own? Become a poster · $1.95/mo, free during preview.